A dream-imagine? If Yeshua had been the Creator's Only Begotten Daughter?

In this dream I am talking with a group of men. Some of these dudes are so fired up about what they believe! They are talking all over each other and trying to make a point louder than the other. I must admit that most of it I agreed with, and I thoroughly enjoyed the exchange and the testosterone!!

At some point, they started talking about Yeshua. They were saying that the Creator had to send a man to do the work. The other men of course all chimed in as if that was the deal, and no other question or comment needed. At this point it was quite evident that my two cents was needed.

 

Me: "Uh, now on this point, I must disagree with you."
Man: What do you mean?
Me: I mean that I am sure the Creator could have chosen a female if there was a conversation between the Creator and Yeshua about that.
Man: Get outa here, girl. Why would the Creator chose a female to do Yeshua's work?
Me: Because Yeshua's work required compassion, understanding, nurturing, love, empathy, intuition, creativity, magic and feelings, etc. These are typically attributed to the female. Men are more martial, ego-centric, analytical, impatient, etc. That's why.
Man: What, Yeshua had a serious mission on his hands, he had to come out fighting!
Me: But he didn't according to the scriptures. He was non-aggressive, not passive, but non- aggressive. In fact, it almost seems that with the persona they used for Yeshua, he was a bit effeminate anyway. Right?
Man: Girl, you talking trash now. What do you mean, effeminate?
Me: Well he certainly doesn't appear buffed, he spoke in soft tones, for the most part, and had a womanly demeanor, if you ask me.
Man: Get outa here! Yeshua was the man and he had a mission. He was a powerful man.
Me: I ain't saying he wasn't powerful, but what I am saying is that had the Creator chose His only Begotten Daughter, the work done by Yeshua, would have lined up energetically with the Female Vibration. That's all I'm saying.

I woke up from this dream still having the conversation with these guys.

http://hugoschwyzer.net/2010/01/11/neither-male-nor-female-jesus-as-man-jesus-as-role-model/

"Jesus got angry, clearly. Jesus also wept publicly, but we rarely hear my traditionalist friends using His example to repudiate the “big boys don’t cry” ethos. Jesus allows Himself to be anointed by a woman, infuriating his disciples who are upset about the cost of the perfumed oil — but perhaps also upset by what seems, to them, like an almost feminine vanity on His part. The examples of Jesus engaging in tender and nurturing behavior far outnumber those in which he behaves as the muscular He-Man of conservative traditionalist teaching."

http://www.nobeliefs.com/washingtonnews/JesusGirl.htm

"JERUSALEM- A team of archaeologists discovered artifacts near the wall in Jerusalem's ancient City of David that not only shows evidence that Jesus actually existed, but that "he" was a female. The amazing discoveries make it, not only the earliest known evidence for Jesus, but reveals that Jesus was actually a girl.
Regardless of traditional interpretations, the new evidence leaves out a heterosexual male interpretation. "Either Jesus was a girl (possibly a lesbian or a Temple prostitute), a homosexual, or a transvestite. There is no other option," says Mazar.

To make matters worse, Christian fundamentalists did not accept the new findings at all. Kent Hovind, a Ph.D from the Patriot Bible University (a Creationist university), angered by the female and the hermaphrodite interpretation, shouted, "This is an outrage! Jesus was NOT a girl. He was NOT a hermaphrodite, and he certainly was not a HOMO. He was a MAN, the SON of God. He had a PENIS!"
Then professor Mazar resonded to Hovind, "Well, if he had a penis, then that would make him gay, NOW WOULDN'T IT?"

Apparently Hovind did not consider this, and the mere thought triggered a violent response. Reporters at the meeting observed Hovind picking up the priceless brass phallic and hitting Mazar on the head. This caused such a commotion that the other professors joined in.

"Everyone jumped in," observed John Botell, a reporter from the New York Times. "It was horrible. Weenker gave Jeffery Clout an upper-cut that caused severe bleeding." Another reporter saw Balzar jumping on Hovind's back where he began punching his head like a rag doll. Shouts of obscenities filled the room. Hovind, a right-wing gun advocate, produced a pistol and began shooting into the crowd. "Fists were flying everywhere and lots of blood was shed in Christ's name," Botell observed.

A police swat team entered the building and finally stopped the masacre. An ambulance came and took many of the injured professors to a local hospital. Doctors, after observing X-rays of Hovind's body, discovered the brass phalus impalled deep into Hovind's rectum.

Jim Walker, an independent observer and non-believer, did not buy any of the interpretations, noting that, "There exists no evidence for a historical Jesus, much less a female Jesus. People will believe anything told to them, as long as the material gets presented to them in a believable way."


As usual, Catholics, Protestants, and Jews fought against each other over a religious interpretation. "This is nothing new," says Walker, "They not only do this every April 1st., they do it everyday."